uniarq
Centro de Arqueologia da Universidade de Lisboa / Centre for Archaeology. University of Lisbon
Financiado por fundos nacionais através da FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, no âmbito do Projecto UID/00698
  • Início
    • Contactos
  • Projectos de Investigação
    • Em curso >
      • ARQEVO
      • Projecto Ansor
      • BeArchaeo
      • Projecto Sado Meso
      • Projecto Retorno ao Sado
      • Projecto MegaGeo
      • Projecto IberAmber
      • Projecto Early Metal
      • Projecto FETE
      • Projecto Molião na Antiguidade
      • Projecto Mesas do Castelinho
      • Projecto Os Santuários
      • PALEORESCUE
      • Projecto Produções e interacções
      • Projecto Casa do Governador
      • Projecto Gruta da Oliveira
      • Projecto Gruta da Figueira Brava
    • Parcerias >
      • LO·RI·VAI - Loulé Velho
      • Miño/Minho. Ocupações da margem esquerda do Baixo Minho
      • MOCRATE: Monte dos Castelinhos e a romanização do baixo Tejo
      • PALÆOCOA - Neanderthal to Anatomically Modern Human transition in the Côa Valley: Environments, Symbolism and Social networks
      • VNSP3000 - Vila Nova de São Pedro, again in the 3rd Millennium
  • Concluídos
    • Projecto Castro Marim
  • Investigadores
  • Publicações
    • uniarq digital 99
    • uniarq digital especial 2024: campanhas de verão revisitadas
    • Revista OPHIUSSA
    • Edições da UNIARQ
    • Venda de Publicações / Book Store
  • Arquivo
    • Arquivo Uniarq Digital
    • a UNIARQ na National Geographic
    • Arquivo de Imprensa
    • Eventos anteriores >
      • Curso de Introdução à Geoarqueologia
      • I Curso de Introdução às Línguas e Epigrafias Paleohispânicas
      • ARQUEOZOO
      • International Conference Women and Writing in the Roman West
      • ARCHAEOLOGY ROCKS!
      • Hybrid Seminar: Facing the Last Glacial Maximum: fresh insights into the Gravettian-Solutrean transition in Southwestern Europe
      • Workshop Fotogrametria para estudo e divulgação do Património
      • Workshop Fotogrametria para estudo e divulgação do Património
      • Isto é Arqueologia! 2021/2022
      • Isto é Arqueologia! 2023/2024
      • Partir Pedra 2022
      • Introdução à Geoarqueologia
      • Introdução à Moeda como Fonte de Estudo
      • Identificar, escavar e estudar sítios do Paleolítico Superior em contextos de Arqueologia Preventiva
      • NOITE EUROPEIA DOS INVESTIGADORES 2020
      • Arqueologia em Construção 3
      • Arqueologia em Construção 4
      • Arqueologia em Construção 5
      • Arqueologia em Construção 6
      • Archaeology at Work 7
      • Arqueologia em Construção 8
      • Arqueologia em Construção 9
      • Arquivo 5º CNP
      • Arquivo ZaP2012
      • Exposição de fotografia
      • workshop sigillata 2015
      • MEGA-TALKS 2
      • workshop Leisner
      • curso breve Bua
      • workshop sinos e tacas
      • FRUITS
  • Protocolos
  • Estatutos
  • Informação Institucional
  • Documentos para Candidaturas
  • Formulários, Manuais e Templates
  • Espaços e Equipamentos
  • ARQUEOLit - Litoteca

MegaGeo project

Moving megaliths in the Neolithic: Geology sourcing of dolmen slabs in C entral-South Portugal (PTDC/EPH-ARQ/3971/2012)

Principal Investigator: Rui Boaventura
Picture
Project Partners: Centro de Arqueologia da Universidade de Lisboa (UNIARQ/FL/UL); Centro de Geofísica da Universidade de Évora (CG/UE); GEOBITEC da Universidade de Aveiro (GEOBIOTEC/UA).

Megalithic tombs, also known as dolmens, are the most conspicuous remains of the populations of the 4th and first half of 3rd millennia BCE. These tombs are impressive not only for their monumentality, but also because of the socioeconomic investment they represent for those Neolithic communities, namely from the Central-South of Portugal, who built them. These constructions are an element of Megalithism, which is viewed by archaeologists as a complex set of magical and religious rules that are related to death and not only a type of funerary architecture. Nevertheless, dolmens appear as the most abundant type of tomb in the region, where thousands have been recorded.

Although dolmens have been studied for their funerary content and typologies, an interdisciplinary approach toward the geological characterization and sourcing of stones used in these constructions has not received enough attention from researchers. When studied, most archaeological analyses of the geology of the tombs and their local geology are limited to brief descriptions of rock types and geology and whether they were the same. When a megalith is found to be made of stones of nonlocal origin, that is usually highlighted but rarely and thoroughly investigated. When rigorous geological identification is conducted for specific dolmens, rarely is any attempt made to verify if there are similar patterns of slab selection on neighboring dolmens and what relationship it might have with its geological background.

Almost a decade ago in Alentejo two projects were conducted on geological identification of megaliths and its sourcing: at Vale de Rodrigo, Évora and at the cluster of Rabuje, Monforte. These projects demonstrated a tendency for the use of local (1-2 km) stones, mainly in small- to middle-sized dolmens (approximately 1-2 m high and 2-4 m long by 2 m wide). In larger tombs there were cases of megaliths sourced to outcrops at greater distances (6-8 km). The proximity and cost/benefit of slab extraction as well as its transport and erection could explain the selection of local stones, but the need for more suitable stones (that were larger or flatter, e.g.), might explain the use of more distant sources. Nevertheless, the intrinsic and phenomenological qualities of certain rocks or geological contexts may have also influenced community’s choices, as much as the prestige and power that those endeavors would give to its members. These hypotheses, however, need to be verified with new studies. In order to provide answers to such questions, an integrated geo-archaeological approach will be applied.

This project intends to assess the relationship between the distribution of dolmens in Central-South Portugal, their source materials, and the geological landscape. GIS will map the information gathered and will be used to analyze these relationships. Three regional case-studies will be analyzed. These cases are from diverse geological backgrounds, and include: 1) Monforte and 2) Redondo, both in Alto Alentejo (Hercynian Massif), and 3) the Lower Estremadura - region of Lisbon (Meso-Cenozoic basin). The selection of these areas, with distinctive geologies, will allow us to verify if human patterns of behavior regarding the selection of megaliths are similar or different regionally. This would be achieved by evaluating the type of rocks used in the constructions of dolmens, the shape, volume and mass of megaliths, as well as identifying and measuring the distances to their potential geological sources. In this case a thorough and detailed geological identification is crucial. Thus, besides macroscopic

description of the megaliths at the tombs, petrography will be conducted by conventional polarized microscopy (transmitted and reflected light) but also recurring to SEM-EDS and RAMAN for semi-quantitate analysis of mineral phases. Elemental whole rock geochemical (IC P-MS) and isotope (TIMS) compositions from megaliths and outcrops are invaluable and supplemental data to guarantee the accuracy of rock differentiation and classification.

The individual expertise of each team member combined within this project is an asset to achieve successfully the multidisciplinary enterprise of project MEGAGEO, to better understand how and why populations of the 4th and first half of 3rd millennia BCE used megaliths and if they were influenced by its geological nature.

August 2014
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.